Jeez.

Political, Religion 2 Comments

wilbur.jpgBen Stein, actor and, uh — I almost said comedian, but he’s not that funny — former host of “Win Ben Stein’s Money” and former speechwriter for President Nixon, is turning out to be a serious nutcase.

And I don’t mean “lovable nutcase,” like dear old Aunt Clara from Bewitched who collected doorknobs. I mean malignant, nasty SOB nutcase, an enemy, in his own way, to core American values.

I know whenever you hear “American values” you automatically think of family-related stuff, like raising your kids right and staying married to the same woman (or  man). Saying the Pledge and honoring the soldiers, eating watermelon at the county fair.

But science is a core American value too, one that stretches back to before the founding of the nation. Ben  Franklin is known as a scientist, for instance. Thomas Jefferson is less known as an experimentalist but was no less a rigorous rationalist and scientific thinker. Wilbur and Orville Wright are quintessential American heroes.

And damn, I hope I don’t have to go into detail for everybody reading this to know that some very large part of our American progress, power and economic growth is a direct result of leadership in scientific education, research and funding.

Science is not something every one of us can DO, but it’s something every American, traditionally, has supported. Sure, there might have been those curmudgeonly few who turned away grumbling when men landed on the Moon, but for the rest of us, that moment was riveting.

I went to watch the Space Shuttle land at Edwards Air Force Base in California in 1981, along with about a quarter of a million other people, and the feeling rippling through that crowd was PRIDE. Pride that humans had done this, but more than that, pride that Americans had done it. There might have been a hundred thousand Japanese cameras in that crowd, but the flags in evidence — no small number of them — were all American.  

After a February visit to Washington, DC, I wrote in an earlier post:

Ten seconds in the door and I’m over by the Apollo 11 Command Module, lines of moisture running down my face. I stand there looking at it, touching the transparent case it rests in, for a good ten minutes.

I’m overcome by just how magnificent an accomplishment this thing represents. In an era when Washington seems a fount of lies and stupidity, this was something done by MY people, the people of learning and reason and courage. Men sat in this thing, and traveled to the Moon! And came back alive!

Maybe I can’t match the feat, but I can recognize the magnitude of it. In my atheist heart, I reserve reverence for true achievement.

This, the real thing, kindles bright sparks inside me, and sets off tears.

So here’s Ben Stein, talking to Christianity Today:

Scientists were the people in Germany telling Hitler that it was a good idea to kill all the Jews. Scientists were telling Stalin it was a good idea to wipe out the middle-class peasants. Scientists were telling Mao Tse-Tung it was fine to kill 50 million people in order to further the revolution.

Scientists = murderous, genocidal elitist maniacs. Got it, Ben.

Jeez.  

Funny how it looks from my side the equation. It looks to ME like Ben Stein, who made a trip to Dachau to underscore the lesson that science causes death and horror, is more of a threat to American values, HUMAN values, than anything science could manage.

……………….. 

Just a side thought: Retroactively in the light of George W. Bush, Nixon looks like a nice man, and a bright, competent one. Yet decades later, to see the anti-intellectual strain that runs like poison through the veins and brains of the conservative Republican movement, now very much present in Ben Stein, Nixon’s former speechwriter, I wonder.

I’d unconsciously assumed that the modern anti-intellectual, anti-science club was something recent, from just the last 10 or 15 years. But then I remember the shootings (murders) of Kent State students by National Guardsmen, and Nixon’s antipathy to student protestors that came out in the smug, hateful speeches of Vice President Spiro Agnew, and I wonder if it didn’t all really start with Nixon.

Did anti-student become anti-college, anti-college become anti-education, anti-education become anti-science? Certainly, to me, anti-science is anti-America.

Whatever.

It does seem to me, though, that when you deny the fruits of the mind — reason and science and art and even compassion — you’ve destroyed yourself as a people.

And here we are in the U.S., down in a political pit, and heading into an even deeper economic one. Will history show this moment, the moment of Ben Stein’s “Expelled,” as the triumph of the know-nothings, the twilight of the American experiment? I wonder.

Man and Animal

Personal, Philosophy 11 Comments

animalman.jpgI’m carrying on a mostly-cordial argument over at Unscrewing the Inscrutable with a fellow named Michael M, an Objectivist and admirer of Ayn Rand.

I’ve been an admirer of Ayn Rand too – I think she was brilliant in the extreme – but I don’t revere her, as some people surely do. Some things, in my opinion, she simply got wrong.

This is my most recent answer to one of Michael’s points, that humans have reason and free will whereas animals have nothing but instincts.

Okay, this is absolutely, positively my last 2,000 words on the subject. :)

Seriously, one of the problems with replying to the arguments of a, for instance, anti-evolution type, is that they can pop out with a single sentence that contains three major mistakes, each of which can take pages to explain and correct.

So I’m focusing again on a single issue:

Read the rest…

Who’s There?

Personal 23 Comments

cartop.jpgI’m curious about who reads here.

Outside the few regular commenters, mostly familiar to me, there seem to be a number of lurkers who read only, and the stats detail on my server identifies the places they’re from. Some of them seem distant and unexpected.

So: Who’s from Great Britain? Germany? Austria? France? Spain? Portugal? Belgium? Italy? Who’s here from the Emerald Isle? 

Hungary? The Netherlands? Poland?

Sweden? Norway? Denmark? Finland?

G’day mate, and who’s here from Australia? And who’s from New Zealand?

South Africa? Hong Kong? Japan? India? Israel?

Canada? Brazil? Mexico? Chile?

South Korea? Latvia? United Arab Emirates? China?

The Russian Federation? Romania? Slovenia??

Love to hear from you. Take a minute to say hello!

And those of you in the States, give me a shout and tell me what state you’re in.

What do you have to be afraid of?

Personal, Philosophy, Political 2 Comments

cop1.jpgEverything is deep. Everything.

The simplest thing you can imagine – a grain of sand, or the fact that you have five toes on each foot – is filled with unimaginable complexities.

Even something as simple as sunlight, taken for granted for thousands of years by humans, turned out, once someone invented the prism, to be a mix of colored light. Strange to think that when you look into a bright white light, you’re also looking into a bright blue light. And a bright red light. A bright yellow light, and so on. But you are.

Light is deep, and so is everything else.

Read the rest…

Fired Up, Fired Out

Personal, Political, Religion 5 Comments

Wheaton CollegeWheaton College, Wheaton, Ill., requires faculty and staff to sign a faith statement and adhere to standards of conduct in areas including marriage. This is, after all, the origin-place of evangelist Billy Graham and the home of the globally evangelistic Billy Graham Center. 

It’s also the place that made national headlines on Feb. 20, 2003, when it lifted its then 143 year-old ban on student dancing. (Whoa! Next thing you know, they’ll be apologizing to Galileo.)

It would be weird to work or go to school in such a place, don’t you think? And yet some choose it, you have to believe deliberately. It does have a pretty respectable academic history.

Here’s a young man (I guess; he kept his identity a secret) who became an atheist halfway through his college years at Wheaton (he just graduated in December), and chronicled the journey in a blog called “Leaving Eden.”

Nov. 29, 2007: “Now is the time when all of my final papers and projects are due, all of which must be from a Christian perspective. Before I started I thought, no big deal, I know what the Christian perspective is, and anyway it’ll be kind of fun using words that I haven’t used in a long time, like sanctification, eschatology, spiritual discipline– not to mention the whole language of Wheaton evangelicalism that I worked so hard to become fluent in. / But man, it sucks. It actually makes me feel a little bit ill to have to do this.”

Read the rest…

A Young Artist’s Heartbreak

Humor, Personal 7 Comments

[Afternote: I looked up the history of Crayola on Wikipedia, and I’ve misremembered some of this. The 96-box came along well after I was in first grade. It was the 64-box I recall. I’ll correct it in a day or so. Meanwhile, here’s the original piece.]

crayons.jpgYou ever have the experience of finding something in your head you didn’t know was there?

I just had one of those moments. I’m not totally surprised to find it there — it’s based on a memory, after all. But it’s a leftover from, oh, about the age of 5 or so, and at my current age of 55, it’s just curious to find it still in there somewhere.

It has to do with how I felt about Crayola crayons. And the memory bubbled up at this bit on the ColourLovers site: All 120 Crayon Names, Color Codes and Fun Facts.

You remember when you were a kid how much you loved your Crayolas? You could do anything with those great colors. I wasn’t much of an artist when it came to creating original works on blank coloring paper, but I was pretty good at picking realistic colors to fill in pictures in coloring books.

Read the rest…

An unfortunately long post about a small but annoying event

Personal 4 Comments

A few years back, I tried to winkle out what it really means to apologize, and I worked out that – to me, at least – an apology has at least four parts.

1) You admit you did something wrong.

2) You show that you understand what it was.

Which means, you explain to the person injured just how you think you injured them. Ideally, you attempt to understand and describe how THEY feel you injured them. Part of this demonstration of understanding is that you visibly attempt to match the scale of the original injury with the scale of the apology. In other words, you don’t just say “Hey, my bad,” after you run over somebody’s head with your car.

3) You promise to try very hard not to do it again, ever.

4) You make an effort to fix what you broke.

Read the rest…

Gosh darn it, Francis Collins

Religion 4 Comments

collins.jpgUgh. This article bubbled to the top pages of Digg today. I’d known about it before, but found it freshly disturbing upon reading it again. From the Times Online:

Francis Collins, the director of the US National Human Genome Research Institute, claims there is a rational basis for a creator and that scientific discoveries bring man “closer to God”.

His book, The Language of God, to be published in [July, 2006], will reopen the age-old debate about the relationship between science and faith. “One of the great tragedies of our time is this impression that has been created that science and religion have to be at war,” said Collins, 56.

“I don’t see that as necessary at all and I think it is deeply disappointing that the shrill voices that occupy the extremes of this spectrum have dominated the stage for the past 20 years.”

  Read the rest…

Atheists should grow some.

Humor, Philosophy, Religion 5 Comments

bull.jpgJonah Goldberg is the author of “Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning,” which I haven’t read, but which has one of those woo-woo doublespeak names – something on the order of “The Anti-White Genocidal History of the Murderous, Hateful American Indians, from the 1500s to the Present” – that doesn’t exactly inspire me to want to rush out and buy it.

I’m pretty sure I’ve also seen one or two atheist-bashing articles in the past by the guy. So when I saw this bit in the LA Times Opinion page online, I figured it wasn’t an April Fool’s Day joke, despite the April 1 date on it. (Evidently he liked the piece so much he repeated it in the National Review Online on April 2.)

Just FYI, it’s editors who typically choose the titles for articles, so I don’t blame Goldberg too much for the header, but the piece is called “Evolution of religious bigotry: The cowardice and intolerance of slapping a Darwin fish on your car bumper.”

Ahem. Yeah.

Read the rest…

PZ Catches Some Flack

Personal, Political, Religion 5 Comments

blood.jpgPZ Myers posted a link to a new video, in which a Dutch somebody or other takes a whack at Islam … by showing pictures of beheadings, bombings, etc. You’ve probably read about it by now. The film is called ”Fitna,” and does present a pretty harsh picture of Islam.

A substantial number of the commenters interpreted the posting of the link as a racist attack on Muslims, and they jumped on Prof. Myers in the comments with claws out on all four feet.

Those poor, maligned Muslims, can’t catch a break because so many people are so racist, so hateful, and the Muslims are really just downtrodden lovers of peace, blah, blah, blah.

Basically, they misinterpreted what Myers did, and what he said, and overreacted.

Here’s my comment on the thing:

Read the rest…

« Previous Entries